Saying that “everyone deserves to be treated with humanity” has become the politically correct rhetoric in today’s society, but is it really a value being upheld? Especially when the meaning of who is or isn’t human varies depending on who has the power to define it.
The cell block that I am on, some of the incarcerated citizens are tasked with the great responsibility of nurturing and fostering abused & neglected dogs – an act of service that will ultimately extend beyond these walls as these dogs will one day be released to families in the community. The dog handlers, who are empowered by the institution, ensure that the dogs are well fed; have an abundance of affection & love; played with; valued; and taught all of the lessons needed to become a great pet. Unsurprisingly the results are amazing, these animals are healthy, and their presence invokes a positive vibe in an otherwise negative environment. When the dogs appear, both incarcerated individuals and staff, run to them, pet them, and leave them with a treat, because it is generally understood that these once neglected animals should be treated with the dignity and care due to a dog. Which is why witnesses these animals sleep on the same exact mattress as us raised the question: What care and dignity is due to a human?
The materials conditions are obvious, but it’s the psychological messaging that’s dangerous. What message does one receive when you witness a dog being treated better than you? Or, that a damaged dog deserve treatment while a human that’s hurting deserve pain (punishment). There’s no way to be conscious of a legacy rooted in denying the humanity of an entire people and not question whether or not being treated less than a dog is the product of such legacy. So my final question is: What humans don’t deserve to be treated with humanity?
No Comments